--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "longtom2222"
<bigverybadtom_at_...> wrote:
> Well, not to start a long debate, but when you draw anthropomorphic
> skunks (or any other being, human or animal) who engage in very
> graphic sexual activity, it's quite logical to assume you intend to
> cause sexual arousal among your viewers. Do you object to viewers
> wanking at the sight of your Skunk Girls? Or anyone who might
> depict themselves having sex with your characters, either in text
> fiction or in artwork? I don't see why someone making an
artificial
> doll or fursuit of your Skunk Girls and using it for sexual
purposes
> would be so much worse than that, whether you get it or not.
Nah, I'm sure folks spank the monkey to the pictures (after all,
there aren't any articles to read!), just as I'm certain there are
some people who make drawings of themselves with the characters.
Hell, I don't have any problem with someone having a doll or
something made. I just cannot understand the "how" or "why" behind
said person having "sex" with a stuffed toy. Obviously, I must not
be from that particular generation. ;)
>
> No, in case anyone is wondering, I'm not interested in stuffed
dolls
> of any of the Skunk Girls for my sexual gratification. I just feel
> it seems wrong to object to those who do. People used to call
> homosexuality perverted as well, and if we're supposed to accept
> that now, what's the objection to anything else?
Unfortunately, there's always going to be objection in our
societies. It's human nature. (And if you want to talk about
objections, you should listen to some of Des's).
--JMH
Received on Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:17:45 CST