Scanners aren't that expensive. Maybe I'll send you a new one. :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Take a wild, friggin guess" <a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com>
To: <SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:03 AM
Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "Nate" <wolfontwolegs@...> wrote:
>>
>> Nah, I don't think she looks much like a Viking to me. Great detail
>> work though. Is this created with colored pencils?
>
> I had to read the post you were responding to again in order to get
> that. Took me a second there. ;P
>
> I use different media for different pictures. This one features
> Prismacolor markers and pencils. I also use gouache, charcoal,
> pastels and (rarely) watercolors.
>
> I'll probably try another scan. My scanner seems to be making it
> too rough looking, and there are several subtle colors and shades
> missing. But hell, this scanners over 10 years old, man, so I guess I
> shouldn't expect too much!
>
> --- and, x data wrote:
>>
>>Holy crap that looks awesome! Also I like how you made her hair look
> like an extension of her fur. I'll be looking forward to this folio :3
>
> Thanks, man. A lot of the female characters I have don't
> necessarily wear "hair" (most, like Veronika, keep the fur on top of
> their heads short). But, yes, the "hair" that these critters have is
> really nothing more than long fur (for example, Natasha's hair, while
> long, actually starts above her brow line and stops at her shoulders.
> But it's cut in a way to appear as if it is just long hair from the
> scalp region).
>
> I reckon I'll try another scan tomorrow. That system is currently
> undergoing it's nightly scan, so I don't mess with it until all that
> noise is done with.
>
> --JMH
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jan 20 2009 - 18:36:14 CST