I've gotta ask, what the heck is a chan board, anyway? If it's as bad as you
say, I won't go, but I don't know what you guys are talking about. Sorry...
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Kit Parenteau <kitfoxen_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Take a wild, friggin guess wrote:
> > --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com <SkunkworksAMA%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Kit Parenteau <kitfoxen_at_...> wrote:
> >
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Well, it's not as bad as sailor cussing, but yeah.
> >>
> >> Now I'm wondering if we should take a pool as to how soon a modified
> >> version of the chan one will show up on a chan board.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I give it less than an hour. Wouldn't mind seeing the morons screaming
> and raging, but I swore off chan boards quite some time ago. I've got better
> things to do than waste my time in front of a computer, listening to a bunch
> of mouth-breathing assholes openly demonstrate their lack of intelligence
> and social skills on a chan board. ;)
> >
> > --JMH
> >
> Don't blame you for not looking at them. The boards seem to have such a
> low intelligence average that they almost seep stupidity out the
> computer when you read them. If there was a concept of "Ways to damage
> your brain that most average people agree really work", reading the chan
> boards would be up there with lobotomies and pavement diving.
>
> Ahh well. I've made my semi-annual appearance. Back to lurking!
>
>
>
Received on Tue May 26 2009 - 00:46:07 CDT