--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, Scrapper Black Dragon <scrapperbd@...> wrote:
>
> Now some people don't believe it is true, but there are a 'set of numbers' - a formula you can use to 'describe sexy' - the ratios that when present tend to give the 'hello' factor.
>
> --- On Sun, 23/8/09, Miguel <my.resistance_at_...> wrote:
> >mmmm... i've been wondering, what are the girls figure numbers
> >or hip to waist ratio i do love em curvy like val (sexy growl)
> >
>
> If you've ever looked at a picture of a girl, even though she didn't seem 'that hot' and thought "yeah, she's not bad", it could be that her ratios were correct your subconscious was saying 'yes!'. On a side note, many girls you see in magazines, we may think "she's not that good", but I bet that if you were dating her in real life, you'd probably be pretty pleased! But that is another story - on with the numbers.
--Yeah, Scrap, I get where you're going on this, mann. We males may think otherwise on certain women we see on magazines/fiction; but if she was ours, we would be lucky as hell to encounter someone like that in our lives. -FTW-
>
> Like the artistic creation of building up a structure where the head/torso/legs all have preferred ratios that look good (lots of things on this in many drawing books) there is also numbers for the 'hourglass figure'. Interesting observations in Pease & Pease about what men fundamentally look for physically in a partner. The most fundamental tends to be the 'athletic body shape' (aka fit figure), 'large breasts' (large is obviously a relative - large compared to normal men), 'wide, child-bearing hips' (the real reason sex was invented). The 'ideal waist to hip ratio' is 70%. Use a ruler (even on a picture on the screen) and measure the two and see what the ratio comes out at. Over 71.0% tends to be 'okay but less interesting' where as 69.0% tends to 'look a bit freaky'. Like what would happen if many 'realistic' cartoons (eg, super hero comics) were to exist in real life - waaaay freaky body shapes!
>
> Knowing the Skunk sister's height, and using 'standard numbers' for humans of that height, you can probably figure out there approximate other figures, then using the ratios to work out approximately what they should be. Allowing Jim draws in proportion, you should be able to figure out waist and hip widths, then using the ratios for bust calculations, figure out that too. (Used to have a link on how to calculate bra cup sizing, but can't find it now that I'm wanting it- typical!).
--Damn shame, mann; that link would sure come in handy for this moment, mann. Either way, no biggie since this is interesting enough about the subject matter on the proper anatomy of a woman's body. And who would've thought numbers would be this important for anatomic measurements?
>
> For those keen on searching the archive, I have brought this subject up previously, speculating the girls are probably an E cup, but had not done the maths as yet to try figure their probable figure figures. ;-)
--Funny, I always thought the skunk sibs were a modest, D, overall in bust size. Everything else I'm assuming their a tad above average in the waist and hip department. Overall, thanks again for the breakdown on the truth about sexy, Scrap. I enjoyed the Hell out of it, mann. Let us know about any other endeavors you wanna share with us, bro. I'm/We're all ears. PEACE-OUT!
-OA OUT-
Received on Sun Aug 30 2009 - 22:11:01 CDT