nice... i need to try and find that hip to ratio calculator on the net,
thank you for the in-depth look on the subject matter
--Dee, The Insane
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:10 PM, outlawoa <outlawoa_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com <SkunkworksAMA%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Scrapper Black Dragon <scrapperbd_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > Now some people don't believe it is true, but there are a 'set of
> numbers' - a formula you can use to 'describe sexy' - the ratios that when
> present tend to give the 'hello' factor.
> >
> > --- On Sun, 23/8/09, Miguel <my.resistance_at_...> wrote:
> > >mmmm... i've been wondering, what are the girls figure numbers
> > >or hip to waist ratio i do love em curvy like val (sexy growl)
> > >
> >
> > If you've ever looked at a picture of a girl, even though she didn't seem
> 'that hot' and thought "yeah, she's not bad", it could be that her ratios
> were correct your subconscious was saying 'yes!'. On a side note, many girls
> you see in magazines, we may think "she's not that good", but I bet that if
> you were dating her in real life, you'd probably be pretty pleased! But that
> is another story - on with the numbers.
>
> --Yeah, Scrap, I get where you're going on this, mann. We males may think
> otherwise on certain women we see on magazines/fiction; but if she was ours,
> we would be lucky as hell to encounter someone like that in our lives. -FTW-
>
>
> >
> > Like the artistic creation of building up a structure where the
> head/torso/legs all have preferred ratios that look good (lots of things on
> this in many drawing books) there is also numbers for the 'hourglass
> figure'. Interesting observations in Pease & Pease about what men
> fundamentally look for physically in a partner. The most fundamental tends
> to be the 'athletic body shape' (aka fit figure), 'large breasts' (large is
> obviously a relative - large compared to normal men), 'wide, child-bearing
> hips' (the real reason sex was invented). The 'ideal waist to hip ratio' is
> 70%. Use a ruler (even on a picture on the screen) and measure the two and
> see what the ratio comes out at. Over 71.0% tends to be 'okay but less
> interesting' where as 69.0% tends to 'look a bit freaky'. Like what would
> happen if many 'realistic' cartoons (eg, super hero comics) were to exist in
> real life - waaaay freaky body shapes!
> >
> > Knowing the Skunk sister's height, and using 'standard numbers' for
> humans of that height, you can probably figure out there approximate other
> figures, then using the ratios to work out approximately what they should
> be. Allowing Jim draws in proportion, you should be able to figure out waist
> and hip widths, then using the ratios for bust calculations, figure out that
> too. (Used to have a link on how to calculate bra cup sizing, but can't find
> it now that I'm wanting it- typical!).
>
> --Damn shame, mann; that link would sure come in handy for this moment,
> mann. Either way, no biggie since this is interesting enough about the
> subject matter on the proper anatomy of a woman's body. And who would've
> thought numbers would be this important for anatomic measurements?
>
> >
> > For those keen on searching the archive, I have brought this subject up
> previously, speculating the girls are probably an E cup, but had not done
> the maths as yet to try figure their probable figure figures. ;-)
>
> --Funny, I always thought the skunk sibs were a modest, D, overall in bust
> size. Everything else I'm assuming their a tad above average in the waist
> and hip department. Overall, thanks again for the breakdown on the truth
> about sexy, Scrap. I enjoyed the Hell out of it, mann. Let us know about any
> other endeavors you wanna share with us, bro. I'm/We're all ears. PEACE-OUT!
>
> -OA OUT-
>
>
>
Received on Mon Aug 31 2009 - 06:57:35 CDT