Agreed.
--- On Sat, 5/15/10, Kishma <Tashta_at_comcast.net> wrote:
From: Kishma <Tashta_at_comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Might be putting up some auctions soon...
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 1:36 AM
Okay, mods. I really think this conversation needs
to be taken to private emails.
Thank you.
Kishma Danielle
----- Original Message -----
From:
Thomas
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:48 PM
Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: Might be
putting up some auctions soon...
--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com,
"Andrew Greene" <blaze_at_...> wrote:
> So if it never comes up,
what're you so worried about? And, I've known
> plenty of jews with big
noses. Many of my relatives are jews with big
> noses. And what's with
'Homosexual proclivities'? Why not just say
> 'homosexual'? There IS
such a thing as bisexuality, yanno.
>
>
I thought it was
obvious from the context that "homosexual proclivities" means sexual arousal
by members of the same gender, e. g. a woman attracted to a female bosom.
(More below.)
>
> >> > As for people experimenting
with homosexuality, I've yet to meet anyone
> who
> >> >
has tried it that weren't already established homosexuals in the first
>
>> > place.
> >>
> >> I've bumped into more
than a few people who have tried it simply for the
> >>
experience.
>
> >I have never tried homosexuality, considering
that I don't like
> proctological examinations, and there's still AIDS
out >there even if it's
> currently out of the news media. I'm sure
there are more people out there
> who have had sex with the >family
pet-if for no reason other than the family
> pet won't talk. If someone
has sex with another of the same gender >without
> definite
homosexual proclivities to begin with, the sex is either
> nonconsensual
(rape or prostitution) or the >person is unable to find a sex
>
partner of the opposite gender.
>
> First of all, by your
reckoning, to be an established homosexual, you have
> to have
homosexual sex, so how does one 'try it' and yet be an established
>
homosexual, whatever the hell that means? Circular argument: see
circular
> argument.
See above. I thought it was obvious that
"established homosexual" is someone who KNOWS they have definite attractions
to those of the same gender...even if they never had had sex with any. An
example is a teenage girl I knew online who announced that she is a virgin
Christian and a lesbian. Females give her sexual feelings, males don't.
QED.
>
> Second of all, what does homosexuality have to do
with proctological exams?
> Presumably you aren't against anal sex, or
you wouldn't be on the SKUNKWORKS
> news group. Jim draws a bunch of it.
Yeah, there's still AIDS out there,
> and gay sex is an increasingly bad
way to get it. Most new AIDS infections
> are of heterosexuals. Gays got
the news in the 80's, for the most part.
>
Well, I wouldn't
want to be a "bottom" (yes, I know that's gay slang for the one who receives a
penis in their anus, as opposed to "top" who puts their penis into an
anus).
Even if your claim is true that heterosexuals are the ones who
get the most new cases of AIDS (which I doubt), it's still a very prevalent
disease among gay people. They were merely the first ones to get it en
masse.
> Now you compare homosexuality to bestiality, which shows
that you not only
> have personal issues, but you're also kind of weird.
Perhaps you are a
> member of a religious organization or culture that
condemns homosexuality.
> I have news for you. They probably wouldn't
like the fact that you look at
> pictures of naked animal chicks as you
masturbate, either.
>
I've known people who have had sex with
animals, and truth be told, I fail to see how that is genuinely worse than
homosexuality. (Actually, animals can consent in the sense that if you do
anything to them that they don't want, they will fight back
savagely.)
> Then you claim that non-gays that have gay sex do it
nonconsensually, or are
> raped. Issues again. I've had sex with a
number of bisexual men, and a few
> who were clearly
straight.
Bisexual men who are clearly straight? Say again?
Why
did they do it? Because either 1) they were
> very good friends, or 2)
because sex feels good! Sex feels good, and
> bisexuality doubles your
chances of getting a date. The idea that gays
> can't find partners of
the opposite sex is kind of silly.
I've already mentioned the concept
of proclivities. There are situations where groups of people who have no
access to anyone of the opposite gender resort to homosexuality for release,
or more often to degrade weaker members of the group. Prison rape, for
example.
Before I came
> out, I dated heavily. I lived with two
women, concurrently. I lived, at one
> point, with two women and another
man in a foursome. It was
> overcompensation on my part, a common
response to discovering that one is
> gay, but being unable to admit it
to one's self. Looking back, my bisexual
> phase was a LOT of fun. I've
had several long-term boyfriends, and I've
> settled down with the
current one, who can be seen on my FA page, for those
> of you who are
curious.
>
Well, you obviously have attraction to other males,
otherwise you would have nothing to "come out" with.
> In closing,
let me point out that if homosexuality is so uncommon, why is so
> much
straight porn focused on gay acts? When they show a blowjob, you get
>
extreme close-ups of cocksucking, with lots of cock and lots of mouth.
They
> don't concentrate on the actor's expression. They don't generally
film it
> from his point of view. It's all cock, and all mouth. Anal sex
in porn is
> just as bad, lots of close-ups of cock plunging into ass,
gaping ass,
> cum-splashed ass and huge cocks in close-up. Why all the
lesbian stuff?
Even close up, it's generally obvious whether the mouth
is that of a male or female.
Long Tom.
Received on Fri May 14 2010 - 23:03:06 CDT