Re: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: queation

From: David Ewell <kuchadude1_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:28:28 -0700 (PDT)


I think this is what I was thinking of.


From: jmhcustomart2004 <a_change_of_plans_at_yahoo.com>
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 7:49 PM
Subject: [SkunkworksAMA] Re: queation


 
Oh, I agree with that. But I wasn't able to figure out a way that the Skunkworks characters would be able to produce a folio of non-existent creatures. On the website, I ended up having to post some images (which contained humans) into a separate section. The current layout features two versions of the site: "Here" and "There". The "Here" version features all the artwork I've drawn for the genre and is written in such a way to make the reader realize it is fiction. The "There" version features artwork and text as it would appear on the Skunkworks website in "their" world; it's as close to role-playing as I could get.

--JMH

--- In mailto:SkunkworksAMA%40yahoogroups.com, DOPR Dragon <dopr5dragon_at_...> wrote:
>
> Simple - the same way one nonexistant anthropomorphic skunk-woman would get
> it on with her sister, the non-existant anthropomorphic skunk-woman - by
> drawing them together.
>
> The whoe point of having something that's not canon is to separate what "is
> true according to the rules of this invented universe" from things that
> "are not true according to the rules of this invented universe". Which is
> why we can see Sonic the Hedgehog characters boinking Sailor Moon
> characters, or Final Fantasy schmucks fighting with Soul Caliber folks.
> It's non-canon fantasy - draw what you want to see outside the normal
> rules.
Received on Tue Oct 02 2012 - 17:52:26 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:46 CST