Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA

From: Lyle K <selaxes_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:01:11 -0700 (PDT)


Then again, are we seeing something Jim is doing for Halloween? Hmm?



There is no such thing as a dream that you cannot obtain.
You may have to work for it, however.
R. Bach, Illusions

From: Kit Parenteau <kitfoxen_at_gmail.com>
To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA

 
Mea culpa.See!  It's the humans!  Damn those humans!  How could you possibly have humans in an otherwise good world?!  That said, what happened to CnC the past three weeks?On 10/29/2012 10:49 AM, Cheetah wrote:
Actually I never handed Jim a script he objected to.. Not once.. not even an idea…  Everyone was just use to what V.Kyrie did in script SHE wrote.. the “sticking to the bed” stuff and all that was NOT scripted by me.. So please don’t lump me in there with objectionable material.. and Half of Jim’s actually objection where because it was a split world with humans, where the human moral code (or lack thereof) could attempt to surface or be used as an argument.

>Cheetah

>From:SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com [mailto:SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kit Parenteau
>Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:42 AM
>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA
>Oh, I never said he was going to swing back, just that this is a far swing from the prior work.  It's fully his right to discontinue the furry work.  Given what he's gone through in the past decade plus, honestly I don't blame him if he wants to.  Des discontinued furry a long while ago.  Jim has been focusing primarily on his main income artwork. 
>
>When doing CnC, he objected to some of the content he was asked to draw, so it didn't happen the way the comic normally would have been.  You have to admit, really, the fandom has some serious sickos in it and so the CnC stuff he objected to is likely the tip of the iceberg. 
>
>If the group is here explicitly to suck up and fap to new work from him, then likely it won't survive.  If it's here to discuss or  handle old work, archive, or other such things, then it might.  I do suspect the former though.
>
>
>On 10/29/2012 9:32 AM, Larry Barron wrote:
>Trust me... this is NOT "normal" he is having some issue/s and wishes to kill off this line of work... I personally wonder how long the group will last after this.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>From:Kit Parenteau mailto:kitfoxen_at_gmail.com
>>>To: SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 10:53 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [SkunkworksAMA] New file uploaded to SkunkworksAMA
>>> 
>>> 
>>>He got kind of burnt out on the porn from what I understand. 
>>>
>>>A swing like this is completely reasonable, especially for somebody with such exacting technical skill.
>>>
>>>On 10/29/2012 7:35 AM, Lyle K wrote:
>>>Geez, Jim....
>>>> 
>>>>

Received on Mon Oct 29 2012 - 15:44:46 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:46 CST