Jim is still very much a part of our lives. As long as we keep his memory
alive, he will never
truly be gone.
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, Jasper Fox jaspisfox_at_yahoo.com
[SkunkworksAMA] <SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> We can have new ideas, hell, there's plenty of wonderful original artists
> still alive, like Terrie Smith or Michelle Light, etc.
> That's not the point to me, I don't know about anyone else, but I want to
> keep him and his memory and work alive, because I loved his art, I loved
> him and I loved his characters.
> I made a fb page for this very reason;
> https://www.facebook.com/pages/James-M-Hardiman-Memorial-page/282226631967666
> And another of his friends is an admin as well.
> The point is, I'll never be able to "move on"
> It doesn't work that way, I'd imagine everyone else who cared about Him
> would agree.
> This isn't about restricting new ideas, we still listen to Bach don't we?
> And none of us ever knew him.
> How much more so for someone we knew and loved...?
>
> On Aug 30, 2015, at 10:17 AM, "turin_aramaia_at_yahoo.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','turin_aramaia_at_yahoo.com');>
> [SkunkworksAMA]" <SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com');>> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think we should all move on. We can't be doing anything except remember
> Jim as he was.
>
> I was saddened by his passing, and was originally interested in preserving
> his creations.
>
> However, by working to preserve a deceased person's ideas, we are
> restricting ourselves from creating our own ideas.
>
> I mean, nobody makes music in the name of Bach, right?
>
> If you want to make new smut fan art, make it with current popular
> characters, like: this:
>
>
> https://derpicdn.net/img/view/2014/2/6/545200__explicit_nudity_blushing_animated_straight_penis_spike_upvotes+galore_smiling_cute.gif
>
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 02 2015 - 23:44:19 CDT
