In a message dated 11/8/2002 6:22:37 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jace_at_softhome.net writes:
> How is it not 'running the group properly' if what he was doing was,
> in his opinion and the opinion of many others, in the best interests
> of the group itself? Would you WANT to see more groups disappear? How
> can you fault someone for taking what are actually quite reasonable
> precautions to protect THEIR groups?
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not blind, I've seen the explanations that
> Yahoo does not force enforcement of any age policy. BUUUUUUUUT, they
> also do not pay any attention to any complaints they get. And so, if
> someone complains about the minors or possible minors on a particular
> group... kiss that group goodbye! Yahoo don't care.
>
The thing I wonder is why, if somebody doesn't want to give their own age
(which I can definitely understand) on their profile, they can't just add 10
or 15 years to it for good measure, in case anybody comes and checks. It's
possible I've definitely missed something here. And if I have, please let me
know.
--------------------
"MythicFox", of Yiffnet, Taps, and pretty much everywhere else now that I
think of it
"It's questionable for a doctor to get involved with one of his patients.
For a vet, it's right out."
ICQ #59987211
Received on Fri Nov 08 2002 - 03:29:26 CST