Re: (unknown)

From: fgdg54gff <fgdg54gff_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:33:20 -0000

i think some of them might like that.

--- In SkunkworksAMA_at_yahoogroups.com, "Inkwell" <inkwell_01@...> wrote:
>
> The fact that a wide range of subject matter
> exists in "furry" art, (plus the artist's own
> behavior), simply means that the "furry" genre
> has become a successful art form - mimicking
> what has already been done under the sun - in
> other art forms.
>
> Fine Art had roughly the same "problems";
> Renaissance, Realism, Impressionism, Cubism,
> (folks didn't know what to make of Picasso)-
> all had problems at all levels of subject
> matter and artist behavior.
>
> Each new adventure in an art form subject matter,
> (not to mention the artist's behavior - anyone
> cut off an ear lately, or consume lsd?) - shocked,
> dismayed, or reviled folks - in and out - of the
> artistic community. Some new group was always
> ruining it for everyone else, to the point where
> the "old-timers" sat around and pined for the
> "good-old-days" of the artist community.
>
> Best way to handle it is to stick to what ya
> like and ignore what ya don't like.
>
> (However, If the oddballs get too annoying,
> [or close] - then bite 'em. Just make sure
> you have had your shots.) ;P
>
Received on Fri Jan 01 2010 - 13:03:07 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sat Nov 30 2019 - 17:52:37 CST